تقلب وسیع در آزمون ورودی پزشکی در هند
Indian relatives scale school walls
to help pupils cheat
منبع: لینک
اگر میخواهید نامتان بهعنوان یکی از حامیان ذکر شود، نام کامل و آدرس وبگاه خود را به آدرس ghodsi_AT_sharif_DOT_edu ارسال نمایید و در صورت تغییر گروه حامی ما را مطلع کنید..
تعداد زیادی آدرس بلاگ خود را فرستادهاند که متاسفانه امکان استفاده از آن بهجای وبگاه نیست.
منبع: لینک
عاون پژوهشی وزیر علوم:
وحید احمدی در خصوص برنامه وزارت علوم جهت جلوگیری از تخلف و تقلب در نشریات علمی به خبرنگار مهر گفت: لیست نشریات نامعتبر تهیه شده که این نشریات حدود ۲۵۰ نشریه خارجی هستند و حتی بعضی از آنها ممکن است ISI باشند.
وی با بیان اینکه در وزارت علوم برای جلوگیری از این تخلفات در نشریات علمی به تدوین و ابلاغ دستورالعمل نحوه بررسی تخلفات پژوهشی پرداخته ایم، افزود: همچنین کارگروه تخصصی برای بررسی و تعیین و تشخیص تخلف علمی تشکیل دادیم تا در این راستا تخلفات مورد پیگیری قرار بگیرند.
به گفته احمدی مصادیق تخلفات پژوهشی که به مهمترین مصادیق متداول در ارتباط با سرقت علمی، عدم رعایت مالکیت معنوی، جعل، داده سازی و غیره پرداخته شده نیز تهیه و ابلاغ شده است.
وی با بیان اینکه ما برای جلوگیری از این تخلفات و کپی کردن مقالات به حمایت و تاکید بر استفاده از نرم افزارهایی همانند «جو» پرداخته ایم.
معاون پژوهشی وزارت علوم گفت: اکنون در حال تهیه پیش نویس لایحه قانونی برخورد با تخلفات پژوهش در خارج از دانشگاه هستیم.
وی در پاسخ به اینکه آیا تاکنون آماری از تخلفات و تقلب های صورت گرفته نشریات علمی به دست آمده است یا خیر، گفت: گزارش ها و نمونه هایی وجود دارد، اما آمار تجمیعی مشخص وجود ندارد.
از: واشینگتن پست
Researcher who spiked rabbit blood to fake HIV vaccine results slapped with rare prison sentence
By Abby Phillip July 1
Former Iowa State University researcher Dong Pyou Han leaves the federal
courthouse in Des Moines, Iowa, on July 1, 2014. (AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall,
File)
Dong Pyou Han, a former Iowa State University researcher charged with falsifying HIV vaccine research, says that his troubles all started as an accident. Quickly, it became a multimillion-dollar research fraud scheme that landed him in prison.
On Wednesday, Han, 57, became a rare academic to not just fall from grace but also be punished with time behind bars.
A federal judge sentenced him to more than four and half years in prison and ordered him to repay $7.2 million in grant funds his team received from the federal government using his falsified data.
Academic misconduct often doesn't even result in researchers losing their jobs, and it is even rarer for criminal charges and prison time to result from one of these cases. In 2006, a researcher pleaded guilty to falsifying information on an NIH grant and was sentenced to a year in prison -- the first time such a sentence handed down for scientific misconduct.
[Citing ‘misconduct,’ accounting journal retracts 25 articles by once-renowned scholar]
In 2013, Han, a Korean national, resigned in disgrace from the Iowa university. The U.S. Office of Research Integrity slapped him with a 3-year ban on pursuing federal research grants. And the university repaid the $500,000 it had received for Han's salary from the NIH.
But the case and the scope of the fraud caught the eye of U.S. Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) who demanded to know why more had not been done to recover the millions spent by the NIH to fund the bogus research.
“This seems like a very light penalty for a doctor who purposely tampered with a research trial and directly caused millions of taxpayer dollars to be wasted on fraudulent studies,” Grassley noted in a 2014 letter to the investigatory office that typically levies punishments for this type of misconduct.
[Gay-canvasser study formally retracted]
And with that, Han became a cautionary tale. Federal prosecutors pursued criminal charges carrying penalties of up to five years in prison.
"Just because somebody has a PhD, just because someone's involved in the scientific community, doesn't mean they're going to necessarily be treated differently than anyone else who's committed a criminal offense," Nicholas Kleinfeldt, U.S. attorney for the southern district of Iowa told CNN.
The lies began in 2008 when Han he worked on an HIV vaccine research team lead by Michael Cho, who was then a professor at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland. Test results from Cho's lab showed that rabbits who were injected with the vaccine GP41 showed signs of antibodies in the blood, suggesting that the vaccine had prompted an immune response against the HIV.
With the seemingly promising research, Cho submitted grant requests to NIH officials who were "flabbergasted," by the results, according to the federal complaint.